Skip to main content

Relationships: The power of SMALL


 


John and Julie Gottman just published “The seven day love prescription”.  For the past fifty years these world-renowned researchers have been researching love and relationships.  So much interesting data has emerged from their research but their general philosophy, based on decades of research, is SMALL.  They suggest that “tiny little doses, every day is what it takes to make a healthy relationship. Why? Because that’s exactly what a relationship is – not one big thing, but a million tiny things, every day for a life time”.   

So, what does this look like in reality? PRACTICE. According to the Gottman’s, love is not a feeling but an action.  They suggest that being good at loving other people is a skill that we can all get better at with practice. 

Sometimes when we think about connection in our relationships, we think about date nights or a weekend away without the kids.  And because we think about connection in these terms, we often feel we need lots of time and energy to “really connect.” This is not true.  We have opportunities for meaningful connection all the time, the smile from our partner on the way out of the kitchen, the comment about the beautiful sunset, the hot cup of coffee that appears in the morning….. but many of us are not even aware that these are what Gottman calls “bids for connection”

A bid for connection is essentially anything we do to connect with our partner.  This might be pointing out what our child is doing, sitting down next to them, touching their shoulder, commenting on how they managed a difficult interaction.  It can even be as subtle as a sigh after a hard day at work.   

These are very small moments in the grand scheme of life, but it is within these small moments that we build resilience and growth into our relationships. 

According to the Gottman’s research when we notice a bid for connection, we tend to respond in one of three ways

1.       Turning Towards: Noticing our partners bid for attention and responding.  This might be answering      them, it might be touching their shoulder, it might be something as small as saying “what.” 

2.       Turning Away: We make no response.  We might ignore them or maybe not even notice that they were   trying to connect with us

3.       Turning Against: We respond with irritation to shut down the bid for connection

This might look something like this - you and your partner are sitting in the sitting room.  Your partner is scrolling on their phone and asks you to have a look at something funny.  To turn towards your partner in this circumstance you might respond with something like “show me” or “read it out to me” or maybe “I will have a look in a minute just let me finish this”.  Turning away is ignoring their comment by either not listening or listening but choosing to ignore what they are saying.  Turning against your partner in this circumstance might be responding in a dismissive or aggressive way - “not now I’m busy” or “that’s ridiculous”

We are human and there is no possibility that we will manage to turn towards our partners all the time.  The good news is that we don't need to do this every single time, but the very important news is that how much we turn towards really does matter to the quality of our relationship.  What the Gottman’s found in their research is

·       Couples who got divorced only turned toward their partners bid for connection 33% of the time

·       Couples who stayed together had turned towards their partner 86% of the time

Often when we are experiencing difficulties in our relationships, we want to focus on conflict resolution.  And while this is important conflict is a very emotive topic for most of us and it can be very hard to change but focusing on very small moments of connection can feel much more manageable.  And the research is clear the more we turn toward each other in the normal everyday moments the better resourced we are to manage the inevitable ups and downs of our relationships.   

Every time we manage to turn towards our partner we are essentially investing in our relationship.  Returning their smile, looking up from our laptops to respond to their comments, squeezing their shoulder as they walk past.  We cannot do this all of the time; we are human and sometimes it is just too hard.  But when we can, we should, because it is these SMALL moments that build resilience in our relationships and give us a much better shot at the long haul.

The Seven Day Love Prescription. Dr John Gottman and Dr Julie Gottman (2022)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The multitasking fallacy

  Ever wonder how your kids manage to spend 6 hours online on a normal Tuesday? They have school for at least 6 hours, they play football, they eat dinner, do their homework, and maybe even watch a bit of TV! They do it because they multitask.   They are on their phones while travelling to school, they are on their phone while eating their lunch, they are on their phones while they are writing their English essay, they might even be on their phones while they brush their teeth before going to bed.   We are a population of multitaskers - watching something on the TV while scrolling Instagram, cooking dinner and shouting solutions to maths problems over our shoulder.   And our kids are no different, they often spent their entire day multi-tasking.   The thing about multi-tasking is that it FEELS hugely effective but is actually hugely ineffective.   Working on a report for work and simultaneously answering emails often makes us feel good but in fact what it means is that we are doing

Understanding the connection between anger and self worth

  I was listening to podcast yesterday with Dr Becky Kennedy, the author of Good Inside, and she said this “Anger is a sign that we have preserved access to our self-worth.”   When we have a high level of self-worth and we do not have access to the things we need we feel angry.   She talked about having a “healthy entitlement” to what you want and need which is intimately connected to feeling worthy. Psychologists often consider anger to be a secondary emotion.   Anger is often what we see when people are feeling any number of other emotions – shame, humiliation, grief.   Anger is often easier to express than shame or humiliation.   It is often easier to say “I’m so livid about what happen” than “I feel really ashamed about what happened”.   Brene Brown in her beautiful book Atlas of the Heart suggests that as many as 20 of the 87 emotions she identifies in the book are likely to present as anger.   How we manage our emotions is influenced by our upbringing.   In many households

Most Generous Interpretation (Dr Becky Kennedy)

Dr Becky Kennedy, a clinical psychologist based in the US, has coined the term Most Generous Interpretation. This concept stems from the basic idea that we are all good inside. Adapting this concept creates space for us to be curious about other people’s behaviour and supports us to shift from “what is wrong with you” to “why is this behaviour happening”. So how do we take this idea and make it applicable in our everyday relationship moments?  Essentially, we do this by asking one simple question “What is my most generous interpretation of what just happened.”   Imagine the scenario – you have just arrived home after a long day at work, you come in the front door and your daughter asks if you have remembered to pick up her book from the library.  You have completely forgotten and apologise to your daughter.  Your daughter starts shouting at you “you are rubbish, you never think about me, I hate you” So how do we respond.  For most of us this will activate our own threat response